Energy Research, Vol. 2, Issue 1, Mar  2018, Pages 52-61; DOI: 10.31058/ 10.31058/

Computational Fluid Dynamics of Dam-Break Problem with Different Fluid Properties Using the Level Set Method

Energy Research, Vol. 2, Issue 1, Mar  2018, Pages 52-61.

DOI: 10.31058/

Ashraf Balabel 1* , Ali Alzaed 2

1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia

2 Architectural Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia

Received: 18 December 2017; Accepted: 20 January 2018; Published: 30 March 2018

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 279 | Download 167


In the present paper, the computational fluid dynamics for one of the most challenging problems of two-phase flows; namely, the unsteady movements of dam break flow, is introduced. The governing momentum equations are solved numerically using the control volume approach over a regular two-dimensional computational grid. The level set method is applied for predicting the transient movements of the dam break free surface flow with a high accuracy solution procedure. The effects of the geometrical parameters of the initial dam shape and the fluid properties such as density, viscosity and surface tension on the dam front movement and dam topological changes are investigated. The obtained results showed a faster movement of the dam front in the downstream direction by increasing the dam height and the fluid density. However, by increasing the fluid viscosity, a slower motion of the dam front is obtained. Moreover, the variation of the fluid surface tension showed a slight effect on the movement of the dam front.


Computational Fluid Dynamics, Dam Break Problem, Fluid Properties, Level Set Method, Two-Phase Flow


© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


[1] Yang, C.; Lin, B.; Jiang, C.; Liu, Y. Predicting near-field dam-break flow and impact force using a 3D model, J. Hydr. Research, 2010, vol. 48 (6), pp. 784-792.
[2] Martin, J. C.; Moyce, W. J., An Experimental Study of the Collapse of a Liquid Column on a Rigid Horizontal Plane, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London 1952, A244, pp. 312-324.
[3] Koshizuka, S.; Oka, Y., Moving particle semi-implicit method for fragmenta- tion of incompressible fluid. Nucl. Sci. Eng., 1984, vol. 123, pp. 421–434.
[4] Stansby, P.K.; Chegini, A.; Barnes, T.C.D. The initial stages of dam-break flow. J. Fluid Mech. 1998, 374, 407–424.
[5] Oezgoekmen, T. M.; Iliescu, T.; Fischer, P.F.; Srinivasan, A.; Duan, J. Large eddy simulation of stratified mixing and two-dimensional dam break problem in a rectagular enclosed domain. Ocean Modelling, 2007, vol. 16, pp.106–140.
[6] Park, R.; JinKim, K.; Van, S. Numerical investigation of the effects of turbulence intensity on dam-break flows, Ocean Engineering, vol. 42, pp. 176–187, 2012.
[7] Eggers, J. Nonlinear Dynamics and Breakup of Free-Surface Flow, Rews. Modern Phys, 1997, vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 865–929.
[8] Balabel A. Numerical Modelling of Liquid Jet Breakup by Different Liquid Jet/Air Flow Orientations Using the Level Set Method, Computer modeling in engineering & sciences, 2013, vol. 95 (4), pp. 283-302.
[9] Balabel, A.; El-Askary, W.; On the performance of linear and nonlinear k–e turbulence models in various jet flow applications. European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids, 2011, vol. 30, pp. 325–340.
[10] Balabel, A., Numerical prediction of droplet dynamics in turbulent flow, using the level set method. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics 2011, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 239-253.
[11] Balabel, A. Numerical simulation of two-dimensional binary droplets collision outcomes using the level set method. International Journal of Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2012, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1-21.
[12] Balabel, A.; Numerical modeling of turbulence-induced interfacial instability in two-phase flow with moving interface. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2012, vol. 36, pp. 3593–3611.
[13] Balabel, A. A Generalized Level Set-Navier Stokes Numerical Method for Predicting Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Turbulent Free Surface. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences (CMES), 2012, vol.83, no.6, pp. 599-638.
[14] Balabel, A. Numerical Modelling of Turbulence Effects on Droplet Collision Dynamics using the Level Set Method. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences (CMES), 2012, vol. 89, no.4, pp. 283-301.
[15] Balabel, A; El-askary, W.; Wilson, S. Numerical and Experimental Investigations of Jet Impingement on a Periodically Oscillating-Heated Flat Plate. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences (CMES), 2013, vol. 95 (6), pp. 483-499.
[16] Shinjo J.; Umemura A. Simulation of liquid primary breakup: Dynamics of ligament and droplet formation, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 2010, vol. 36(7), pp. 513-532.
[17] Hegab, A.; Gutub, S.; Balabel, A. A Developed Numerical Method for Turbulent Unsteady Fluid Flow in Two-Phase Systems with Moving Interface, International Journal of Computational Method, 2017, Vol. 14 (6), pp. 1750063-1-1750063-28.
[18] Sussman, M.; Smereka, P.; Osher, S. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flows, J. Comp. Physics, 1994, 114, 146-159.
[19] Abu-alsaud, M.; Soulaine, C.; riaz, A.; Tchelepi, H. Level-set method for accurate modeling of two-phase immiscible flow with moving contact lines, Fluid dynamics, 2017, Vol. 2, pp.1-29.
[20] Patankar, S. V. Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1980.
[21] Kölke, A. Modellierung und Diskretisierung bewegter Diskontinuitäten in Randgekoppelten Mehrfeldaufgaben, Ph.D. Thesis 2005, TU, Braunschweig, Germany.