Agricultural Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Apr  2018, Pages 80-88; DOI: 10.31058/ 10.31058/

Predatory Efficiency of Two Predator Ants on Coelaenomenodera Elaeidis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Agricultural Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Apr  2018, Pages 80-88.

DOI: 10.31058/

Aneni, T.I 1* , Aisagbonhi, C.I 1 , Adaigbe, V.C 1 , Iloba, V.C 2 , Aghayedo, C.O 1

1 Entomology Division, Nigerian institute for Oil Palm Research, Benin, Edo State, Nigeria

2 Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, University of Benin, Benin, Edo State, Nigeria

Received: 3 January 2018; Accepted: 20 January 2018; Published: 23 March 2018

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 293 | Download 176


The predatory efficiency of Micromischoides sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Oecophylla longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) collected from an oil palm field in the main station of the Nigerian Institute for Oil palm Research for the control of the leaf miner larvae, Coelaenomenodera elaeidis, was investigated in the laboratory at ambient temperature of 270C ± 0.5; 80% ± 2.5 relative humidity and 12:12 h photoperiod. Predatory efficiency of the ants was tested on leaf miner larvae at 4, 24, 48 and 72 h. These were compared with untreated leaf miner larva (control). Chi-square test of significance was used to analyze predatory efficiency and time on the two ant species. Variation in seasonal predator abundance was evaluated. The results show that Micromischoides sp. destroyed the leaf miner larvae after 72 hours while Oecophylla longinoda were not observed to attack the larvae. This study identifies Micromischoides sp. as a predator which offers potential as a biocontrol agent for C. elaeidis.


Predatory Efficiency, Micromischoides sp., Oecophylla longinoda, Leaf miner


© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


[1] Holldobler, B.; Wilson, E.O. The ants: Harvard University Press. 1990, 732.
[2] Jones, C.; Lawton, J.; Shachak, M. Organisms as ecosystems engineers. Oikos, 1994, 69(3), 373-386.
[3] Bennet, A.; Krebs, J. Seed dispersal by ants. Trends Ecol. 1987, 2, 291-292.
[4] Vasconcelos, H.L.; Cherrett, J.M. Leaf-cutting ants and early forest regeneration in Central Amazonia: Effects of herbivory on tree seedling establishment. J. Trop. Ecol. 1997, 13, 357-370.
[5] Sheppe, W. Invertebrate predation on termites of the African savanna. Insectes Soc. 1970, 17, 205-218.
[6] Hölldobler, B.; Wilson, E.O. The ants. 1990. Cambridge: Harvard University.
[7] Ross, K.G.; Keller, L. Ecology and evolution of social organization: Insights from fire ants and other highly eusocial insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1995, 26, 631-656.
[8] Way, M.J.; Heong, K.L. Significance of the tropical fire ant Solenopsis geminate (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as part of the natural enemy complex responsible for successful biological control of many tropical irrigated rice pests. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2009, 99, 503-512.
[9] Fernandes, F.L.; Picanço, M.C.; Fernandes, M.E.S.; Xavier, V.M.; Martins, J.C.; Silva, V.F. Controle biológico natural de pragas e interações ecológicas com predadores eparasitóides em feijoeiro. Bioscience Journal, 2010, 26, 6-14.
[10] Choate, B.; Drummond, F. Ants as biological control agents in agricultural cropping systems. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews, 2011, 4, 157-180.
[11] Lawton J.H.; Bifnel D.E.; Bolton B.; Blowmers G.F.; Eggleton P.; Hammond P.M.; Hodda M.; Holt R.D.; Larsen T.N.; Mawdsley N.A.; Stork N.E.; Srivastava D.S.; Watt A.D. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature. 1998, 391, 72-76.
[12] Underwood E.C. and Fisher B.L. The role of ants in conservation monitoring: If, when and how. Biological Conservation, 2006, 132, 166-182.
[13] Mc Geoch M.A. Insects and Bioindication: Theory and Progress. In Stewart A.J.A., New T.R. & Lewis O.T. (Eds). Insect Conservation Biology, CABI, Wallingford, United Kingdom. 2007, 144-174.
[14] Abera-Kalibata A.M.; Gold C.S.; Van Driesche R.G.; Ragama P.E. Composition, distribution, and relative abundance of ants in banana farming systems in Uganda. Biological Control, 2007, 40, 168-178.
[15] Symondson W.O.C.; Sunderland K.D.; Greenstone M.H. Can Generalist Predators be Effective Biocontrol Agents. Annual Review of Entomology, 2002, 47, 561-594.
[16] Negm A.A.; Hensley S.D. Evaluation of certain biological control agents of the sugarcane borer in Louisiana. Journal of Economic Entomology, 1969, 62, 1008-1013.
[17] Roche R.; Abreu S. Control del picudo del plátano (Cosmopolites sordidus) por la hormiga Tetramorium guineense. Ciencas de la Agricultura, 1983, 17, 41-49.
[18] Way M.J.; Khoo K.C. The role of ants in pest management. Annual Review of Entomology, 1992, 37, 479-503.
[19] Rossi M.N.; Fowler H.G. Ant predation of larval Diatraea saccharalis Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in new sugarcane in Brazil. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2000, 124(5-6), 245-247.
[20] Rossi M.N.; Fowler H.G. Predaceous Ant Fauna in New Surgarcane Fields in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2004, 47(5), 805-811.
[21] Natural Resources Institute (NRI). Insect pests of Nigerian Crops: identification, biology and control. Natural Resources Institute Chatham, U.K. 1996, 253.
[22] Gerald, B.M. A review of 50 years applied entomology in Nigeria: Tree Crops. Ent. Soc. Nig. 1967, 25-38.
[23] Afreh-Nuamah, K. Insect pests of tree crops in Ghana. Identification, damage and Control measures. Buck press. Inc. 1999, 65.
[24] Morin, J.P. and Mariau, D. Sur la biologie Coelanomenodera elaeidis. IV. La dynamique des populations du ravageur et ed ses parasites. Oleagineux, 1972, 27(10), 469-472.
[25] Hartley, C.W.S. The Oil Palm. Third Edition. Longman London. 1988, 761.
[26] Wood, B.J. Pest-Introduction and Ecological Considerations. In:Oil Palm Research. Developments in Crop Science. 1976. (1). Eds. R.H.V. Corley, J.J. Hardon and B.J. Wood. Elsevier Scientific Publishing company, Amsterdam. pp. 334-346.
[27] Daodu, Y.U. Survey for oil palm pests at Kus and Bunso conducted during May and June 1974. 1974. Annual Report, Crops Research Institute, 11.
[28] Appiah, S.O. A review of research on Coelaenomenodera minuta, Uhmann (Coleoptera: Hispidae) in Ghana. Proceedings of the International Conference On Palms and Palms Products, 1989, 1, 453-457.
[29] Appiah, F.O.; Kolade, K.; Airede, C.E.; Osagie, I.J. Development of cost Effective integrated pest management techniques for the control of Coelaenomenodera elaeidis and Homophylotis catori and other pests of oil palm, NIFOR Report, 2007, 153-164.
[30] Agwu, S.I.; Appiah, F.O.; Aisagbonhi, C.I. The occurrence and control of the Oil palm leaf miner, Coelaenomenodera elaeidis Mlk. 1986. In Nigeria. Proceedings of International conference on oil palm, Port – Harcourt, 9th – 15th November, 1986.
[31] Huffaker, C.B. (ed.) Biological Control. Proc. Amer. Asso. Adv. Sci. Symp. Biol. Control. Plenum Press, New York. 1970, 511.
[32] Wood, B.J. Development of integrated control programs for pests of tropical Perennial crops in Malaysia. In: Biological control (Ed. By C.B. Huffaker). 1971, 422-457, Plenum press, New York.
[33] Corley, R.V. and Tinker, P.B. The Oil Palm. Fourth Edition. Blackwell Science Ltd. 2003, 562.
[34] Vine, H. Studies of soil profiles at the WAIFOR main station and other sites of oil palm experiments. J. W. Afr. Inst. Oil palm Res. 1956, 1(4), 8-59.
[35] FAO-UNESCO. 1990. Soil map of the world. 1: 5000,000, Legend, FAO, Paris.
[36] Ojanuga, A.G.; Lekwa, G.; Akamigbo, F.R. Survey genesis and classification of acid sands. In: Acid sands of Southern Nigeria. SSSN Special Publication Monograph. Soil Sci. Soc. Nigeria. 1981, 1, 1-18.

Related Articles