Health Research, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Jun  2018, Pages 34-44; DOI: 10.31058/j.hr.2018.23004 10.31058/j.hr.2018.23004

Experimental Testing of Single and Double Medical Gloves Static Friction with Surgical Scalpel for Studying the Safety of Manipulation During Surgery

Health Research, Vol. 2, Issue 2, Jun  2018, Pages 34-44.

DOI: 10.31058/j.hr.2018.23004

Ahmed Fouly Anwer 1*

1 Department of Production Engineering and Mechanical Design, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Egypt

Received: 28 July 2018; Accepted: 31 August 2018; Published: 1 November 2018

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 445 | Download 267

Abstract

In conventional surgeries, protection of surgeon and his team from infection, due to patient blood exposure, is a significant issue. Using gloves is a common barrier technique which prevents patient bacteria or viruses permeating the surgeons hand. However, using sharp surgical tools led to gloves perforation which stimulates surgeons to wear double gloves to offer extra protection. Nevertheless, many clinicians are reluctant for donning double gloves as it may affect tactile sensation and manipulation skills. One objective of this study is to compare between single and double gloves friction with a surgical scalpel, where static friction can affect the gripping and manipulating process. Tests were carried out using single and double latex gloves sliding over four scalpel surface topologies and in different contact conditions (dry, wet, blood and blood diluted by water). Donning double gloves was found to raise the static friction coefficient in all conditions. Experiments using water and blood-wet conditions indicated that water would increase the friction higher than that observed in the dry condition as it increases the electrostatic charge between surfaces and consequently the adhesion between them. Blood increases the friction over dry and wet conditions because of coagulation which forms a blood clot that withstands the finger movement. Serrated surface gave the highest friction coefficient which makes it efficient for gripping and manipulating.

Keywords

Single and Double Gloves, Gloves perforation, Scalpel Surface Topology

Copyright

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

[1] Lutsky, K.F.; Jones, C.; Abboudi, J.; Kirkpatrick, W.; Liss, F.; Leinberry, C.; Ilyas, A.; Martin, D. and Beredjiklian, P.K. Incidence of Glove Perforation During Hand Surgical Procedures. Journal Hand Surgery, 2017, 42, 840.e1-840.e5, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.103.
[2] Lathan, S. R. Caroline Hampton Halsted: the first to use rubber gloves in the operating room. Proc. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. 2010, 23, 389-392. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2943454/ (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[3] Shouldice, E. E. and Martin, C. J. Wound Infections, Surgical Gloves and Hands of Operating Personnel. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1959, 81, 636-640. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1831313/ (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[4] Russell, T.R.; Roque, F.E. and Miller, F.A. A new method for detection of the leaky glove: A study on incidence of defective gloves and bacterial growth from surgeons’ hands. Arch. Surg. 1966, 93, 245-249.
[5] Skaug, N. Micropunctures of rubber gloves used in oral surgery. Int. J. Oral Surg. 1976, 5, 220-225. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/824214 (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[6] Otis, L.L. and Cottone, J.A. Prevalence of perforations in disposable latex gloves during routine dental treatment. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1989, 118, 321-324. Available online: https://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(89)83012-0/abstract (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[7] Katz, J.N.; Gobetti, J.P. and Shipman, C. Fluorescein dye evaluation of glove integrity. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1989, 118, 327-331. Available online: https://jada.ada.org/article/S0002-8177(89)83013-2/abstract (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[8] Dodds, R.D.A.; Barker, S.G.E.; Morgan, N.H.; Donaldson, D.R. and Thomas, M.H. Self protection in surgery: the use of double gloves. Br. J. Surg. 1990, 77, 219-220, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800770228 (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[9] Cohn, G.M. and Seifer, D.B. Blood exposure in single versus double gloving during pelvic surgery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 162, 715-717, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(90)90992-G (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[10] Tanner, J.; Parkinson, H. Double gloving to reduce surgical cross‐infection. Cochrane Libr. 2006, 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub 2.
[11] Webb, J.; Pentlow, B. Double gloving and surgical technique. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1993, 75, 291.
Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2497939/ (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[12] Fouly, A.; FathEl-Bab, A.M.; Nasr, M.N. and Abouelsoud, A.A. Modeling and experimental testing of three-tip configuration tactile sensor for compensating the error due to soft tissue surface irregularities during stiffness detection. Measurement, 2017, 98, 112-122, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.11.032.
[13] Mylon, P.T.; Buckley-Johnstone, L.; Lewis, R.; Carré, M.J. and Martin, N. Factors influencing the perception of roughness in manual exploration: Do medical gloves reduce cutaneous sensibility? Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2015, 229, 273-284, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650113517111 (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[14] Drumwright, E.; Shell, D. A. An evaluation of methods for modeling contact in multibody simulation. IEEE International Conference on the Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011, 1695-1701.
[15] Carré, M.J.; Tan, S.K.; Mylon, P.T. and Lewis, R. Influence of medical gloves on fingerpad friction and feel. Wear, 2017, 376, 324-328, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.077.
[16] Lewis, R.; Menardi, C.; Yoxall, A. and Langley, J. Finger friction: grip and opening packaging. Wear, 2007, 263, 1124-1132, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.024.
[17] Khashaba, M. I.; Ali, A. S. and Ali, W. Y. Increasing the Safety of Material Handling of Robots. 1st International Workshop on Mechatronics Education, Taif, Saudia Arabia, 2015.
[18] Mahmoud, M. Frictional Behavior of Different Glove Materials Sliding Against Glass Sheet. J. Appl. Sci. 2016, vol. 16, 491-495, DOI: 10.3923/jas.2016.491.495.
[19] Mylon, P.; Lewis, R.; Carré, M.J.; Martin, N. and Brown, S. A study of clinicians’ views on medical gloves and their effect on manual performance. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2014, 42, 48-54, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.07.009 .
[20] Barnes, S.; Spencer, M.; Graham, D. and Johnson, H.B. Surgical wound irrigation: a call for evidence-based standardization of practice. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2014, 42, 525-529, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.01.012.
[21] Rabinowicz, E. Stick and slip. Sci. Am. 1956, 194, 109-118. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26122743 (accessed on 11, 09, 2018).
[22] Burgo, T.A.; Silva, C.A.; Balestrin, L.B. and Galembeck, F. Friction coefficient dependence on electrostatic tribocharging. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02384.
[23] Ali, A. S. and Khashaba, M. I. Triboelectrification Of Latex And Polyethylene Gloves. EGTRIB 2016, 13, 34-45. Available online: http://www.egtribjournal.com/archive.html (accessed on 11 September 2018).
[24] Dinç, O.S.; Ettles, C.M.; Calabrese, S.J. and Scarton, H.A. Some parameters affecting tactile friction. J. Tribol. 1991, 113, 512-517, DOI: 10.1115/1.2920653.
[25] Chen, M.; Kato, K. and Adachi, K. The comparisons of sliding speed and normal load effect on friction coefficients of self-mated Si 3 N 4 and SiC under water lubrication. Tribol. Int. 2002, 35, 129-135, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00105-0.