Health Research, Vol. 4, Issue 2, Jun  2020, Pages 10-19; DOI: https://doi.org/10.31058/j.hr.2020.42002 https://doi.org/10.31058/j.hr.2020.42002

A Review of Detection Techniques of Breast Cancer

, Vol. 4, Issue 2, Jun  2020, Pages 10-19.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31058/j.hr.2020.42002

Bindia Tarika 1*

1 Computer Science & Engineering, PTU, Punjab, India

Received: 21 December 2019; Accepted: 8 April 2020; Published: 3 July 2020

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 61 | Download 37

Abstract

Breast cancer is sometimes found after symptoms appear, but many women with breast cancer have no symptoms. This is why regular breast cancer screening is so important. Finding breast cancer early and getting state-of-the-art cancer treatment are the most important strategies to prevent deaths from breast cancer. Breast cancer that’s found early, when it’s small and has not spread, is easier to treat successfully. Getting regular screening tests is the most reliable way to find breast cancer early. Early detection of breast cancer gives the best possible chance of survival. The earlier an abnormality is discovered, the greater the number of effective treatment options available. This ensures the best possible outcome. This paper describes various techniques of detecting the breast cancer as its necessary to detect it and only after that one can enhance or treat the same. It also gives the result that why screening is important to women for this.

Keywords

Breast Cancer, MRI, CBE, Mammogram, Biopsy

Copyright

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

References

[1] OrelS.Schnall, M. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancerRadiology, 2001220(1), 13-30.

[2] Berg, W.Gutierrez, L.NessAiver, M.Carter, W.Bhargavan, M.Lewis, R.Ioffe, O. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, U.S., and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancerRadiology, 2004233, 830-849.

[3] Poplack, S.Tosteson, T.Wells, W.Pogue, B.Meaney, P.Hartov, A.Kogel, C.Soho, S.Gibson, J.Paulsen, K. Electromagnetic breast imaging: Results of a pilot study in women with abnormal mammogramsRadiology, 2007243, 350-359.

[4] Meaney, P.Fanning, M.Li, D.Poplack, S.Paulsen, K. A clinical prototype for active microwave imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techniques, 200048(11), 1841-1853.

[5] Klemm, M.Craddock, I.Leendertz, J.Preece, A.Benjamin, R. Radar-based breast cancer detection using a hemispherical antenna array—Experimental resultsIEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. 2009, 57(6), 1692-1704.

[6] Ozmen, N.; Dapp, R.; Zapf, M.; Gemmeke, H.; van Ruiter, N.V.; Dongen, K.W. Comparing different ultrasound imaging methods for breast cancer detection. IEEE Tran. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2015, 62, 637-646.

[7] Roganovic, D.; Djilas, D.; Vujnovic, S.; Pavic, D.; Stojanov, D. Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: Comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2015, 15, 64.

[8] Hassan, A.M.; El-Shenawee, M. Review of electromagnetic techniques for breast cancer detection. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2011, 4, 103.

[9] Xu, P.; Peng, Y.; Sun, M.; Yang, X. SU-E-I-81: Targeting of HER2-Expressing Tumors with Dual PET-MR Imaging Probes. Med. Phys. 2015, 42, 3260.

[10] Chen, T.; Artis, F.; Dubuc, D.; Fournie, J.J.; Poupot, M.; Grenier, K. Microwave biosensor dedicated to the dielectric spectroscopy of a single alive biological cell in its culture medium. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (IMS), Seattle, WA, USA, 2-7 June 2013.

[11] Löhndorf, M.; Schlecht, U.; Gronewold, T.M.A.; Malavé, A.; Tewes, M. Microfabricated high-performance microwave impedance biosensors for detection of aptamer-protein interactions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 87, 1289.

[12] Kim, N.Y.; Dhakal, R.; Adhikari, K.K. Practical RF Biosensor Technology; LAP Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2017.

[13] Eubank, W.B.Mankoff, D.A.Vessille, H.J. et al. Detection of Locoregional and Distant Recurrences in Breast Cancer Patients by Using FDG PETRadioGraphics, 2002225-17.

[14] Schettino, C.J.Noz, M.E.; Kramer, E.Taneja, S.Lepor, H. Impact of Image Fusion of the 111In Capromab Pendetide with MR or CT in Patients with Recurrent Prostate CAJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 200042, 294.

[15] NelsonT.R.; CervinaL.I.; BooneJ.M. Classification of breast computed tomography data. Med Phys. 2008351078-1086.

[16] GongX.; GlickS.J.; LiuB.; et al. A comparison simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. Med Phys. 200633, 1041-1052.

[17] ChenB.; NingR. Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. Med Phys. 200229755-770.