Management, Vol. 3, Issue 1, Apr  2020, Pages 29-46; DOI:

Evaluating Project Planning and Control System in Multi-project Organizations under Fuzzy Data Approach Considering Resource Constraints (Case Study: Wind Tunnel Construction Project)

Management, Vol. 3, Issue 1, Apr  2020, Pages 29-46.


Mohammad Taghipour 1* , Nader Shamami 2 , Ahad Lotfi 3 , Shahrooz Parvaei Maryan 4

1 Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Industrial Engineering-Operations Research and Systems Engineering of Qazvin, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran

3 Islamic Azad University, Maku Branch, Iran

4 Department of Mangement, Faculty of Management, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad university, Rasht, Iran

Received: 17 March 2020; Accepted: 5 April 2020; Published: 16 April 2020

Full-Text HTML | Download PDF | Views 3266 | Download 1960


Projects can be repetitive tasks in specified periods of time and also it may involve some functions which are performed just once. However, in any project, managers and experts consider three basic and important goals: least time, lowest cost and best quality, so all efforts are directed toward achieving these basic goals. Statistics indicate that projects are either conducted on estimated time or delayed and rarely are delivered before due date. Even if an activity is completed earlier in implementation phase, its post requisite activity would not be performed due to resource constraints and unavailability or project manager’s mistakes in estimating right time for activities. According to planning for technology advances within next years and gaining independence in this engineering field, our country is not an exception to this rule and there are urgent needs of scattering and promoting wind tunnel technology in different types and velocities at university and industry level. Wind tunnels are available in both open and closed circuit modes and are classified into subsonic, transonic, supersonic and ultrasonic based on their speed, each of which are used for specific purposes and have their own unique advantages and disadvantages.


Project Management, Fuzzy Logic, Wind Tunnel, Activities


© 2017 by the authors. Licensee International Technology and Science Press Limited. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


[1] Chanas S.; Kamburowski. J. The Use of Fuzzy Variables in PERT. Fussy Sets and Systems, 1981, 5, 11-19.

[2] CroxattoA.; GreubG. Project Management: Importance for Diagnostic Laboratories. Review article, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2017, 23(7), 434-440.

[3] KivilaJ.; MartinsuoM.; VuorineLSustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projectsInternational Journal of Project Management, 2017, 35(6), 1167-1183.

[4] MauroL.; MartensM.; CarvalhoMKey factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers' perspectiveInternational Journal of Project Management, 2017, 35(6), 1084-1102.

[5] KarenE.; PapkeS.; KathleenM.; BoyerWStrategic planning characteristics applied to project managementInternational Journal of Project Management, 2017, 35(2), 169-179.

[6] KoshkinaI.; SharamkoMEconomic Security and Internal Control of the Academic Research ProjectsProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 214, 858-865.

[7] WangX.; YungP.; HanbinT.MAn innovative method for project control in LNG project through 5D CAD: A case studyAutomation in Construction, 2014, 45, 126-135.

[8] TaghipourM.; VosoughA.; KazemiN.; AhitabarP. The Study of the Application of Risk Management in the Operation and Maintenance of Power Plant ProjectsInternational Journal of Business Management, 2018, 3(3), 98-110.

[9] RezvaniB.A.; GhobadianV.; TaghipourM. The design of high-rise building with ecological approach in iran(Alborz Province)International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research. 2015, 2(10), 455-464.

[10] TaghipourM; SerajF; AmirH.M; Farahani, K.S. Risk analysis in the management of urban construction projects from the perspective of the employer and the contractor. International Journal of organization Leadership, 2015, 4, 356-373.

[11] MahboobiM; TaghipourM; AzadehM. Assessing Ergonomic Risk Factors Using Combined Data Envelopment Analysis and Conventional Methods for an Auto Parts ManufacturerAccept: Work-a Journal Of Prevention Assessment '& Rehabilitation2020.

[12] TaghipourM.; VosoughA.; AziziD.; AbdiJ. Insurance Performance Evaluation Using Bsc-Ahp Combined Technique. Journal National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald2018, 4, 112-120.

[13] RezvaniB.M.; TaghipourMIdentification and Management of Risks in Construction ProjectsAmerican Journal of Civil Engineering, 2015, 3(5)170-177.

[14] ColinJ.; VanhouckeM. A comparison of the performance of various project control methods using earned value management systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(6), 3159-3175.

[15] SabeghiN.; HamedR.TareghianE.D.; HasanTDetermining the timing of project control points using a facility location model and simulationComputers & Operations Research, 2015, 61, 69-80.

[16] BalfeN.; LevaM.C.; CiarapicaA.C.; O’MahoneySTotal project planning: Integration of task analysis, safety analysis and optimisation techniquesSafety Science, 2017, 100, 216-224.

[17] TaghipourM.;  KheirkhahanH.;  MahboobiM.;  MohammadiMThe Evaluation of the Relationship between Occupational Accidents and Usage of Personal Protective Equipment in an Auto Making UnitInternational Journal of Innovative Research in Science,Engineering and Technology, 2015, 4(9).

[18] Baghipour, S.F.; BozorgiA.A; MououdiM.A.; TaghipourMModeling of Nurses’ shift Work schedules According to Ergonomics: A case study in Imam sajjad (As) Hospital of RamsarJournal of Ergonomics, 2016, 4(1), 1-12.

[19] YunS.; ChoiJ.; DanielP.; OliveiraS.P.; MulvaY.KMeasuring project management inputs throughout, capital project delivery. International Journal of Project Management, 2016, 34(7), 1167-1182.

[20] TaghipourM.; HoseinpourZ.; MahboobiM.; ShabrangM.; LashkarianTConstruction projects risk management by risk allocation approach using PMBOK standard. Journal of Applied Environmental And BiologicalSciences, 2015, 5(12), 323-329.

[21] KaufmannA.; GuptaM.MFuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management ScienceNorth-Holand, Amesterdam, 1988, 221-242.

[22] KlirG.J.; FollgerT.AFuzzy Sets Uncertainty, and InformationPrentice-Hall,Englewood Cliff, 1988.

[23] HwangC.L.; MasudA.S.MMultiple Objective Decision Making: Methods and ApplicationsSpring-Verlag, Heidelberg1979.

[24] Lai, Y.J.WangC.L. Fuzzy Mathematical Programming, Methods and applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg1992.

[25] McCahonC.S. Using PERT as an approximation of fuzzy project-network analysisIEEE transactionon engineering and management, 199340(1), 146-153.

[26] RamikJ; RimanekJInequality Relation Between Fuzzy Numbers and it’s Use in Fuzzy OptimizationFuzzy Sets and Systems, 1985, 16, 123-138.

[27] LaiY.J.; HwangC.LA new approach to some Possibilistic Linear Programming Problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1992, 42.

[28] MemarianiASome Syudies in Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Crip,Random and Fuzzy EnvironmrntsPhD Dissertation1992.

[29] WernersB. An Interactive Fuzzy Programming SystemFuzzy Sets and Systems, 1987, 23, 131-147.

Related Articles